- Leasing Real Property
- Individual Health Policies Cost Insurers Less Than Group
- Workers Comp Costs Continue to Fall
- Foreign Travel
- 2006 National Workers' Compensation Premium Rate Rankings
Leasing Real Property
Landlord and tenant both have major insurance related concerns in negotiating real property leases. Major areas that should be addressed in the lease include:
- Responsibility to third parties for bodily injury or property damage
- Responsibility to each other for bodily injury or property damage, including damage to the leased property and its use value
- Responsibilities and rights in the event of damage to or destruction of the leased property
Relevant provisions are not limited to the “insurance” section. Your insurance advisor needs to review the entire lease to identify both those exposures that can and should be insured and those that cannot. Provisions labeled “damage or destruction”, “indemnification,” “subrogation,” or “environmental” are only a few examples.
The parties respective bargaining positions - or the abilities of their attorneys - may determine who wins and who loses most of the battles on the “fine print”. There are no such things as a “standard lease” or “standard provisions”.

Don Way
CEO
Individual Health Policies Cost Insurers Less than Group
Health insurers spend less on patients with individual policies than those with employer-sponsored plans, according to a new study by The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. However, patients with individual policies typically have higher out-of-pocket expenses than their counterparts who purchase plans through their employers.
Individual health policies may carry low premiums but people need to understand that sometimes the plans are inexpensive because they don’t offer very rich benefits, said Gary Claxton, a vice president at the foundation and author of the study. Individual plans may have a higher deductible, copay or coinsurance, or may not cover certain services such as brand name prescriptions. Additionally, you must qualify for an individual policy and if you have certain medical conditions you may be declined coverage.
The study found that an insurer spends an average of $756 annually on an individual between the ages of 18 and 34 who has bought his own policy but spends $1,174 on a person in the same age range in an employer-sponsored plan. Similarly, insurers spend an average of $942 annually on a person between the ages of 35 and 49 with an individual plan compared to $1,622 on someone in the same age range with an employer-sponsored plan.
Workers Comp Costs Continue to Fall
The Oregon Consumer and Business Services Department has put out its biennial chart on national workers’ comp rates and California no longer has the highest rates in the nation. Alaska is No. 1 in 2006 with a rate of $5.00 per $100/payroll. California is at $4.13 per $100/payroll and 166 percent of the national median, but trending down.
Foreign Travel
Do you have:
- employees that travel internationally
- employees stationed in foreign countries
- employees that attend international trade shows
- employees that perform service or repair work overseas
For minor exposures, simple and inexpensive endorsements to your domestic insurance policy may suffice. For more extensive exposures, special coverage is required.
2006 National Workers' Compensation Premium Rate Rankings
The Oregon Consumer and Business Services Department has put out its biennial chart on national workers’ comp rates and California no longer has the highest rates in the nation. Alaska is No. 1 in 2006 with a rate of $5.00 per $100/payroll. California is at $4.13 per $100/payroll and 166 percent of the national median, but trending down.
2006 |
2004 |
State |
Index |
Percent of |
Effective Date |
1 |
2 |
Alaska | 5.00 | 201% | January 1, 2006 |
2 |
1 |
California | 4.13 | 166% | January 1, 2006 |
6 |
3 |
Florida | 3.32 | 134% | January 1, 2006 |
10 |
18 |
New York | 3.15 | 127% | October 1, 2005 |
12 |
5 |
Ohio | 3.00 | 121% | July 1, 2005 |
17 |
14 |
Texas | 2.64 | 114% | January 1, 2006 |
20 |
23 |
Illinois | 2.69 | 108% | January 1, 2006 |
30 |
26 |
Nevada | 2.36 | 95% | January 1, 2005 |
36 |
35 |
Washington | 2.17 | 88% | January 1, 2006 |
42 |
42 |
Oregon | 1.97 | 79% | January 1, 2006 |
51 |
52 |
North Dakota | 1.10 | 44% | July 1, 2005 |
If you have any questions regarding topics mentioned in this newsletter, please contact our office.
To begin receiving your FREE newsletters, please Sign Up Now.
Thoits Thoughts Copyright Notice
Thoits Thoughts is designed to provide information on insurance, risk management, and employee benefit issues of interest to our readers. Laws, insurance coverages and features vary in some states. Information herein is necessarily condensed and therefore not applicable to all situations. Though we believe them to be accurate, facts and conclusions are not guaranteed. Thoits Thoughts is distributed with the understanding that it does not constitute legal, accounting or other professional advice. Legal, accounting or other expert assistance should be sought from professionals in those fields. © 2006 Thoits Insurance Service, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in written form without written permission. Permission is routinely granted upon written request.
CA License 0243213
